Controversy over IRS illegal sharing immigrant tax information

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is facing a backlash after revelations that it improperly provided thousands of sensitive tax and personal information about immigrants to immigration authorities.

This information, which is strictly confidential and subject to federal law, is sparking controversy as concerns are raised that the sharing process may have violated legal safeguards.

According to a Washington Post report, the IRS recently discovered that the personal information of thousands of individuals was incorrectly provided during a data sharing process with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

This incident stemmed from a request by the Trump administration to track down individuals suspected of being undocumented immigrants.

DHS requested the addresses of 1.2 million individuals from the IRS, and the IRS reportedly improperly shared the personal information of thousands of individuals while providing information on 47,000 of them.

New Jersey will reduce property tax burden for those over 65.

New Jersey homeowners over the age of 65 will see a significant reduction in their property taxes.

According to the New Jersey State Treasurer, the rebate program for senior homeowners, “Stay NJ,” will begin disbursing rebates starting on the 9th. The state treasurer stated, “Approximately 438,000 homeowners are estimated to be eligible for Stay NJ,” and “Beneficiaries will receive their rebate checks sequentially by mail.”

Stay NJ, which targets New Jersey homeowners over the age of 65 with an annual household income of less than $500,000, will reduce their property taxes by half, with a maximum rebate of $6,500. If the total refund amount through the existing property tax relief programs, ANCHOR and Senior Freeze, is less than half of the annual property tax payment, the remaining difference will be paid under the name of the “Stay New Jersey” program. However, the total refund amount through these three property tax relief programs cannot exceed $6,500.

Refunds through Stay New Jersey will be paid in quarterly installments, and the first installment will be delivered starting on the 9th. The Treasury Department announced that the average first installment of Stay New Jersey to be sent to beneficiaries is $639.

Stay New Jersey refunds being sent this year are for residents who submitted and were approved last year on the “PAS-1,” the Integrated Application for the Property Tax Relief Program for Individuals 65 and Older. If you did not apply last year but submitted the PAS-1 this year, you will be eligible for the benefit starting next year. You can check your individual Stay New Jersey eligibility and refund amount on the state Treasury website (nj.gov/treasury/taxation/staynj/index.shtml).

Outdoor dining is once again permitted to operate year-round.

The New York City Council is set to begin drafting an ordinance that would allow outdoor dining to operate 24/7 again. Council Speaker Julie Menin announced on the 4th, “We plan to begin working in earnest on a plan to completely revise the current regulations so that outdoor restaurants can operate 365 days a year, just like they did during the COVID-19 pandemic.”

To this end, Councilmember Menin plans to re-introduce and pass the so-called “Expanding Access to Outdoor Dining” ordinance (Int. 1421), which was already introduced by Councilmember Lincoln Resler (Democrat) in October of last year. The ordinance has already passed public hearings with the Consumer Protection Committee and the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee but has not been brought to a vote due to the end of the session.

This ordinance includes a provision to remove the “seasonal restrictions” on “Roadway Cafes,” which are outdoor dining establishments installed along the roadside. Under current regulations, Roadway Cafes, unlike Sidewalk Cafes installed on pedestrian roads that can operate 24/7, can only operate for eight months (10 a.m. to midnight) from April 1 to November 29 each year, and must be removed during the four-month winter season from November 30 to March 31. The new ordinance also includes a provision that allows general grocery stores to apply for Sidewalk Cafe licenses, which is currently only available to restaurants.

The analysis is that the reason Council Member Menin is pushing for this year-round outdoor dining policy again is because of the sharp decline in outdoor dining. According to data from the City Transportation Department, the number of outdoor dining establishments peaked at 12,000 during the pandemic and then stabilized at 6,000 to 8,000. However, since the first regulation was implemented last year, the number of Roadway Cafes has decreased significantly to 849 and Sidewalk Cafes 1,973.

Councilmember Menin added, “If outdoor dining is allowed to operate 24/7, it will not only reduce job losses but also provide substantial support for the survival of small businesses like restaurants.” New York City Mayor Zoran Mamdani also said immediately after winning last year’s election that he supports outdoor dining, saying, “We support outdoor dining all year round.”

If the related ordinance passes this year, it is expected to be implemented without delay. Meanwhile, New York City’s outdoor dining program was created as an emergency measure to help restaurants facing closure during the COVID-19 pandemic, and it operated 24/7 without cost. However, with the end of COVID-19, the temporary program was modified with the introduction of licensing fees and seasonal restrictions requiring temporary winter closures.

Construction on the New York-New Jersey halting.

Construction on the Gateway project, a new Hudson River train tunnel linking New York and New Jersey, is on the verge of halting.

This is because federal funding has been frozen for months, making it impossible to continue construction. According to the Gateway Development Board, which oversees the new Hudson River train tunnel, contractors have already been notified that construction must halt completely as of February 6th unless new funding is secured. The Trump administration has withheld federal funding for the project for nearly four months, dating back to October of last year.

The Department of Transportation has declared a funding freeze pending a review of new federal rules prohibiting consideration of race or gender in the selection of contractors for the Gateway project. In addition, President Trump blamed Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer for the federal government shutdown last October.

Following President Trump’s remarks, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy stated that a review of the project was underway, but funding has yet to resume. With federal funding freezing, the Gateway Development Board secured a $500 million credit line to continue construction but has now reached its limit. The current Hudson River Tunnel, the sole rail passage between New York and New Jersey, is 116 years old and suffering from serious aging issues.

The need for a new train tunnel, the Gateway Project, has long been emphasized, and construction finally began in 2023 and is currently underway. However, without $11 billion in federal support, which accounts for approximately 70% of the total $16 billion project cost, it is virtually impossible to complete.

In this regard, Senate Majority Leader Schumer and other Democratic lawmakers from New York and New Jersey sent a letter to the Trump administration on the 28th, strongly urging the swift release of federal funds allocated to the Gateway Project.

ICE shifts focus to targeting criminals

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has decided to completely revise its enforcement policy in Minnesota, where controversy over indiscriminate immigration raids, including the shooting of civilians, is growing.

According to a Reuters report on the 29th, new internal guidelines have been issued to ICE agents deployed in Minnesota, outlining a “traditional targeted raid” method that will only target immigrants with confirmed criminal records. The new guidelines stipulate that all targets in Minnesota must have a clearly proven “criminal nexus,” meaning that they are under criminal charges or have been convicted. This is a stark change from the previous method of indiscriminate raids and arrests of even non-criminal immigrants on the streets.

The New York Times pointed out the reason for the shift in direction, saying, “In recent months, ICE raids have moved away from the ‘traditionally targeted raids’ that target only those with confirmed criminal records.” Field procedures will also be significantly strengthened.

Agents will be required to use loudspeakers to clearly announce their identities and purposes during arrests, and any contact or conversation with protesters other than to deliver orders will be prohibited to avoid unnecessary friction. This is interpreted as a measure to address controversy over excessive response by ICE and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents.

According to CNN, the new guidelines came amidst numerous behind-the-scenes discussions between the White House and the Department of Homeland Security on how to effectively conduct immigration enforcement operations in Minnesota.

Tom Homan, the new director of Border Enforcement, who was dispatched to Minnesota by President Trump, is said to be deeply involved in this process. At his first press conference in Minneapolis on the 29th, Homan indirectly acknowledged responsibility, saying, “The federal government’s approach was not perfect.”

He announced that he would return to “traditionally targeted enforcement, as we have done for decades,” and that he would “only target people we know in the field and where they are.” Homan also stated that, with cooperation from the Minnesota state government, the number of ICE agents stationed in Minneapolis could be reduced.

However, it remains unclear whether this Minnesota policy shift will lead to a nationwide shift in immigration enforcement. A White House official stated that “discussions are ongoing to improve operational efficiency,” and that no final policy has been finalized.

The Washington Post is restructuring amid plummeting profits.

Bloomberg News reported on the 26th that the influential American newspaper The Washington Post (WP) is planning to carry out large-scale workforce reductions.

Paul Fahy, a freelance journalist from the WP, told X (formerly Twitter) that day, citing former colleagues, that up to 300 people could lose their jobs. It has been reported that the sectors that will be hit hardest by this restructuring are foreign correspondents and sports.

Some Washington Post correspondents have publicly emphasized the need to continue covering the region through social media. Yeganeh Torbaty, a correspondent covering Iran and Turkey, appealed to X, citing the US-Israeli airstrikes since June of last year and the recent protests, saying, “We want to continue this important work.”

The Washington Post has also decided to reduce its staff to four from the original ten to cover the Winter Olympics in Milan, Italy, next month. Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, who acquired the Washington Post in 2013, has invested heavily in expanding the paper’s reach. However, recent plummeting advertising revenue and declining readership have led to restructuring.

Approximately 240 people will be laid off in the form of voluntary retirements in 2023, and another round of voluntary retirements was held last year. While the Washington Post is considered progressive, it sparked controversy in the 2024 presidential election when an editorial endorsing former Vice President Kamala Harris, a Democratic candidate, was not published due to Bezos’ objection.

Criticism spread both inside and outside the Washington Post, accusing businessman Bezos of making this decision based on the potential re-election of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump. Over 200,000 readers canceled their subscriptions.

Furthermore, internal opposition, including the resignations of several Washington Post reporters and editors, has been significant.

Tensions rise as US aircraft carrier strike group gathers.

Amid widespread speculation that the US military is amassing military assets, including aircraft carrier strike groups, in the Middle East in preparation for an attack on Iran, tensions are rising in the region, the New York Times reported on the 26th.

Officials in the Middle East believe that if the US attacks Iran, Iran and pro-Iranian militias could retaliate by attacking US military bases throughout the region, setting off a cycle of retaliation and counterretaliation. The US military is expected to finalize preparations for an attack on Iran soon, should it so choose.

The US Central Command announced today that an aircraft carrier strike group, including the USS Abraham Lincoln and three warships armed with Tomahawk missiles, has been deployed to the Middle East, within the command’s area of responsibility, to promote security and stability in the region. According to the New York Times, if the White House orders an attack on Iran, the carrier strike group could theoretically take military action within a day or two. The US has already deployed 12 additional F-15E attack fighters to the Middle East to bolster its airstrike capabilities.

Iran and pro-Iranian militias have issued harsh warnings, threatening a vigorous response if Iran is attacked. However, when Iran’s nuclear facilities and other targets were attacked in June of last year, Iran’s actual response was minimal. Iranian Defense Ministry spokesman Reza Talaynik, referring to the June war, said, “If we are targeted by US-Zionist forces, our response will be more decisive and more painful than before.” Hours later, Iran’s semi-official ISNA news agency reported that the Iranian navy commander said the military was “fully prepared to defend the country’s sovereignty.”

A large billboard in central Tehran square took 25 days to paint, depicting a destroyed US aircraft carrier. The image, with blood flowing in ribbons from the blue deck of the aircraft carrier into the sea, resembles a “blood-soaked American flag.”

On one side of the painting is a warning: “Sow the wind and you will reap the whirlwind.” Since the deployment of US military assets to the Middle East, pro-Iran forces have also declared that they will retaliate if Iran is attacked.

At an event held south of Beirut, Lebanon, Hezbollah leader Naim Qassim said, “When Trump threatens Imam Khamenei, he is threatening tens of millions of his followers. It is our duty to confront this threat with all necessary measures and preparedness.” Many of the participants waved Iranian flags or posters with images of Iranian leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Kataib Hezbollah, an Iraqi Shiite militia, issued a statement on the 25th, urging its fighters to prepare for war, saying it may decide to declare “Operation Martyrdom” if the conflict escalates. The Iran-backed Kataib Hezbollah warned that a war against Iran would not be easy, saying, “You will experience all the pain of death, nothing of yours will remain in our region, and we will strike fear into your hearts.”

Recently, Joe Kent, director of the U.S. National Counterterrorism Center, warned Iraqi officials at a conference in Baghdad that if Iranian-backed Shiite militias in Iraq attack U.S. forces, the United States will retaliate against these militias. The U.S. military is based in Erbil, in Iraq’s semi-autonomous Kurdistan region. Neighboring countries are taking a cautious approach to avoid being drawn into the conflict. The UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement on the 25th, reaffirming its commitment to “not allowing Iran to use its airspace, territory, or waters for any hostile military action against Iran, nor to provide any material support in this regard.”

Retired Vice Admiral Kevin Donegan, former commander of the US Naval Forces in the Middle East, told the New York Times that an attack on the Iranian government would have an unpredictable outcome, and that President Trump’s purpose in amassing military assets was likely not to secure a direct military victory, but to strengthen his position in future negotiations. He said, “While attacks on Iran’s missile systems and command-and-control systems have occurred in the past, they still possess a large number of missiles and drones capable of striking US military bases in the region.

The current US military posture appears to be a maximum pressure strategy with the goal of ‘negotiations.'”

Trump suspends immigrant visas to 75 countries

The Trump administration has decided to suspend processing immigrant visas for nationals of 75 countries deemed likely to require welfare and public benefits while living in the United States.

The State Department announced on the 14th that, at the direction of Secretary Marco Rubio, it has instructed consular staff in those countries to suspend issuing immigrant visas starting on the 21st. However, this measure does not apply to non-immigrant visas for short-term stays such as tourism and business trips.

In a statement, the State Department explained, “This visa suspension affects 75 countries whose immigrants receive unacceptable levels of welfare benefits from American citizens,” and “Immigrants from these countries often become public charges upon entry to the United States.”

Public charges refer to people who rely on government assistance for basic living and welfare services. This measure will remain indefinite until the State Department completes its assessment of the countries’ visa vetting practices. The State Department has not yet released the full list of affected countries, but according to the Washington Post, Russia, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Afghanistan, Somalia, Nigeria, Iraq, Thailand, and Mongolia are included. South Korea is not included.

President Trump signed an executive order shortly after taking office last year directing increased vetting of foreign nationals seeking to enter the United States, and the Trump administration has since implemented stricter visa vetting standards. In November of last year, he sent a letter to embassies around the world instructing them to deny visas to applicants who are likely to rely on “public benefits” from the United States.

“Greenland Is in US Interests… European Tariffs Concern”

Former Vice President Mike Pence, who was the second-in-command during Donald Trump’s first term, expressed his support for President Trump’s push to annex Greenland on the 18th, but expressed concern about the president’s threat to impose tariffs on some NATO allies.

In an interview with CNN that day, Pence said, “Right now, I think the issue isn’t ‘what’ the president is trying to accomplish, but ‘how’ he’s trying to accomplish it.” He said, “What he’s trying to accomplish here is completely in America’s interests,” adding, “The person who first proposed purchasing Greenland was former President Abraham Lincoln’s Secretary of State, who negotiated the Alaska Purchase.”

Former Vice President Pence, however, stated, “I have concerns about the questionable use of constitutional authority to achieve this goal by imposing unilateral tariffs on NATO allies. I’m just as concerned about that as I was about the threat of military invasion (of Greenland), a threat that doesn’t seem to be on the table anymore.”

He also noted that Denmark sent troops to the United States on 9/11 and suffered the highest per capita loss of troops of any country, and emphasized, “While I hope the current situation (of the conflict between the United States and Europe) will change and deescalate, I think it threatens to rupture our strong relationship not only with Denmark but with all of our NATO allies.”

Pence continued, “The persistent threat of incursions by China and Russia into the Arctic is real, and one of the steps the administration can take is simply to deploy troops to the region. The president’s ‘Golden Dome’ is a wonderful and visionary idea, but to fully realize it, it will require more territory, including Greenland.”

He added, “So, we have a real stake, but I’d like to see us invest. That could lay the groundwork for the people of the region and ultimately for Denmark to divest from Greenland and find a path forward for the United States.”

“Free education for two-year-olds”

New York City will provide free childcare to all two-year-olds.

This marks the first free policy of New York City Mayor Zoran Mamdani, who created a sensation with promises such as higher taxes on the wealthy, a rent freeze, free childcare, and free bus transportation.

Mayor Mamdani announced at a joint press conference with New York Governor Kathy Hokule in Brooklyn on the 8th, “We are launching a new free child care (2-care) program for two-year-olds in New York City,” and “We will also expand the existing 3-K program for three-year-olds and the pre-kindergarten (Pre-K) program for four-year-olds, strengthening universal child care services for children under five in the state.” This announcement is a measure to fulfill part of Mayor Mamdani’s campaign promise to provide universal childcare for children from six weeks to five years old.

New York State will fully fund the first two years of the “2-care” program in New York City, focusing on high-need areas identified by New York City in the first year and then gradually expanding to other areas. The city estimates that the new program will provide free childcare to approximately 100,000 additional children.

The total budget needed is $1.7 billion, and the statewide childcare and early education budget is projected to increase to $4.5 billion in fiscal year 2027. Furthermore, New York State’s plan to strengthen universal childcare will make all three-year-olds in New York City eligible for 3-K programs and all four-year-olds in the state eligible for free pre-K by fiscal year 2028-29. The state will also invest an additional $500 million to expand pre-K seats.

Governor Kathy Hokule said at a press conference that day, “Protecting families is a top priority for this administration, and I look forward to working with Mayor Mamdani to reduce the burden of childcare costs and make universal childcare a reality.”

She added, “Above all, I hope that this expansion of universal childcare services will help working families and their children in this state.” Mayor Mamdani added, “I look forward to working with the state to make New York City a place where parents can raise their children without financial burden,” and “Ultimately, we will work to provide free childcare to all children six weeks old and older.”

Mayor Mamdani’s office estimated the total cost of his universal childcare plan at approximately $6 to $7 billion annually, which he said could be covered by raising taxes on New York’s wealthiest families and increasing other revenue sources.